Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEthics Eye
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-24T14:32:19Z
dc.date.available2025-11-24T14:32:19Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-19
dc.identifier.urihttps://archive.veriteresearch.org/handle/456/7660
dc.descriptionThis entry includes a write-up and an infographic (both in Sinhala).en_US
dc.description.abstractOn June 14, 2024, the Divaina newspaper published an editorial that violated media ethics by using inappropriate language. The editorial included terms such as “Rumath” (රූමත්) and “Suruupi” (සුරූපී), which contribute to the sexual objectification of women. It also used derogatory terms such as “Ganika” (ගණිකා) and “Kudda” (කුඩ්ඩා), which promote marginalisation and negative attitudes. Furthermore, the inclusion of derogatory terms such as "Ganikaa" (prostitute) and "Kudda" (little girl) is unacceptable, as it perpetuates marginalization and fosters negative attitudes. The media is encouraged to avoid using these terms, especially in negative contexts, as they can lead to the marginalisation of women and individuals who use drugs, further contributing to the sexual objectification of women.en_US
dc.language.isosien_US
dc.publisherColombo: Verité Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEthics Eye;
dc.subjectMedia ethics violationen_US
dc.subjectDiscriminatory reportingen_US
dc.subjectSexist reportingen_US
dc.subjectUnethical reporting – Sexual objectificationen_US
dc.subjectරූමත්en_US
dc.subjectසුරූපීen_US
dc.subjectකුඩ්ඩාen_US
dc.subjectUnethical reporting - Marginalisationen_US
dc.titleඑකම කතුවැකියක් තුළ “සුරූපී”, “රූමත් ගණිකා” හා “කුඩ්ඩෙක්”en_US
dc.typeInfographicsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record