Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEthics Eye
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T05:24:25Z
dc.date.available2023-03-06T05:24:25Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://archive.veriteresearch.org/handle/456/5355
dc.descriptionThis entry includes 3 write-ups and 3 infographics (both in Sinhala).en_US
dc.description.abstractDuring the month of May 2022, several tv primetime news telecasts covered the ongoing economic crisis in Sri Lanka, where different channels adopted different framings and varied in their coverage of the Inland Revenue (Amendment) Act and the appointment of new members to the COPE committee. On October 3 Derana, Hiru, ITN, Sirasa, Swarnavahini, and Siyatha reported the appointment of new members to the COPE committee, whilst Rupavahini did not report it. On October 12, Derana, Hiru, Sirasa, Swarnavahini, and Siyatha reported the gazetting of the Inland Revenue (Amendment) Act in the headlines, whilst ITN and Rupavahini did not report it in the headlines. On October 13, Derana, Hiru, ITN, Sirasa, Swarnavahini, and Siyatha reported opinions that were expressed against the Inland Revenue (Amendment), whilst Rupavahini did not report the opposing opinions.en_US
dc.language.isosien_US
dc.publisherColombo: Verité Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEthics Eye;
dc.subjectMedia ethicsen_US
dc.subjectBias reporting - Economic crisis - COPE committeeen_US
dc.subjectBias reporting - Economic crisis - Inland Revenue (Amendment) Acten_US
dc.titleආර්ථික අර්බුදය පිළිබඳ මාධ්‍ය වාර්තාකරණය en_US
dc.typeInfographicsen_US
dc.project.codePlatform ethics eyeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record