Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMedia Team
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-25T04:30:44Z
dc.date.available2026-06-25T04:30:44Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://archive.veriteresearch.org/handle/456/8258
dc.descriptionThis Insight is originally published in the Daily Mirror 5 November 2014 (https://www.ft.lk/opinion/fishing-trespasses-a-legal-insight-for-better-economics/14-366121). Sinhala and Tamil versions are also included here.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe protracted dispute over fishing in the Palk Bay has been a feature of Indo-Lanka relations for decades. Both India and Sri Lanka regularly arrest fishermen for violating the International Maritime Boundary Line (IMBL). An estimated 2,000 Indian mechanised bottom trawlers enter Sri Lankan waters each day on at least three days of the week. Currently, there are two proposals under consideration to solve the problem. The first is to better police the IMBL and the second is to introduce a licensing regime. This analysis explains why neither proposal actually solves the problem, and introduces a better alternative: imposing a total ban on mechanised bottom trawling.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherColombo: Verité Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVerité Insights; November 2014
dc.subjectFishing issueen_US
dc.subjectFishing issue - Protracted dispute over fishing in the Palk Bayen_US
dc.subjectFishing issue - Bottom trawlersen_US
dc.subjectInternational Maritime Boundary Line - IMBL - Violation by fishermenen_US
dc.subjectEcon Insightsen_US
dc.titleFishing trespasses: A legal insight for better economics = අනවසර ධීවර ඇතුළුවීම්: යහපත් ආර්ථිකයක් සඳහා නෛතික දැක්මක්en_US
dc.typeInsighten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record