Who is Responsible for ‘Alternative Facts’ on Cigarette Taxation?

dc.contributor.author	Fernando, Nilangika
dc.contributor.author	Munas, Hasna
dc.date.accessioned	2019-06-06T03:03:36Z
dc.date.available	2019-06-06T03:03:36Z
dc.date.issued	2017-07
dc.identifier.issn	2386-1762
dc.identifier.uri	http://repo.veriteresearch.net/handle/123456789/505
dc.description.abstract	There are three false claims that have been prevalent in print media, in relation to the tax and price increases of cigarettes in the last quarter of 2016. The claims were that (i) tax revenue reduced, (ii) beedi consumption increased, and (iii) CTC lost economic value. The Insight provides analysis that contests all three claims.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Insight;Vol.4, No. 03
dc.subject	cigarette	en_US
dc.subject	tobacco	en_US
dc.subject	CTC	en_US
dc.subject	Ceylon Tobacco Company	en_US
dc.subject	Tobacco taxation	en_US
dc.title	Who is Responsible for ‘Alternative Facts’ on Cigarette Taxation?	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US