Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVerité Research
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T12:55:02Z
dc.date.available2021-03-19T12:55:02Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.veriteresearch.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/3193
dc.description4p. This Insight was first published in the Daily Mirror on 4 March 2015. See: http://www.dailymirror.lk/65313/economics-of-broken-window-is-applicable-to-corruption.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Sirisena presidency and the UNP that championed it have been endorsed by the ballot with the hope that they will take action against the rampant corruption that was felt to be hurting the public welfare under the SLFP-led Rajapaksa presidency. Two months into the new presidential term, two concerns are being raised. (1) That the progress against corruption is too slow (2) That actions against ‘small fish’ are unwarranted. This article provides insights from economics on the second concern and on the economic importance of countering corruption.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherColombo: Verité Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVerité Insights;
dc.subjectCorruption in governmenten_US
dc.subjectCorruption in bureaucracyen_US
dc.subjectElectronic Document Interface – EDIen_US
dc.subjectTransparency – politicalen_US
dc.subjectE-governanceen_US
dc.titleEconomics of the broken window is applicable to corruptionen_US
dc.typeInsighten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record