Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNishan, de Mel
dc.contributor.authorSubhashini, Abeysinghe
dc.contributor.authorMathisha, Arangala
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-08T10:25:14Z
dc.date.available2023-09-08T10:25:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.identifier.issn978-624-5514-03-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://archive.veriteresearch.org/handle/456/5983
dc.description10p. This note is available in English and Sinhalaen_US
dc.description.abstractThis brief shows that the failure to factor external debt outside central government agencies leads to an underestimation of Sri Lanka’s debt. This underlying informational problem is illustrated in three sections. The first section outlines the difference between public external debt and central government external debt. The second section demonstrates the lack of visibility on the composition of external public debt figures using the example of how Sri Lanka reports its external public debt to China as a case study. The analysis exposes a loophole, by which the debt statistics can be manipulated by moving the debt from the books of the central government to the books of SOEs. The final section concludes by highlighting the critical importance of improving the reporting of Sri Lanka’s debt position to better reflect its debt dynamics and obligations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherColombo: Verité Researchen_US
dc.subjectDebt reportingen_US
dc.subjectPublic Financeen_US
dc.subjectPublic External Debten_US
dc.subjectState-Owned Enterprisesen_US
dc.subjectSOE Debten_US
dc.subjectChina debten_US
dc.titleNavigating Sri Lanka's Debt: Better Reporting Can Help – A Case Study on China Debten_US
dc.typeresearchreporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record