Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArudpragasam, Amita
dc.contributor.authorNathaniel, Vidya
dc.contributor.authorChaaminda, Sumith
dc.contributor.authorMohammed, Rehana
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Sarinda
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-31T09:26:59Z
dc.date.available2019-10-31T09:26:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://archive.veriteresearch.org/handle/123456789/785
dc.descriptionOverall editorial supervision was provided by Gehan Gunatilleke. Includes a foreward written by Kusal Perera. Sinhala translation of the report (සර්ව පාක්ෂික නියෝජිත කමිටුව: ව්‍යවස්ථාමය සම්මුතියකට ප්‍රවේශයක්) is also uploaded.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis report is a historical study that aims to: 1. Explain the failure of successive attempts at state reform culminating in the All Party Representative Committee (APRC) process; and 2. Demonstrate that the proposals of the APRC can represent a valuable starting point for renewed deliberations on constitutional reform. It is presented in five sections: Section I outlines constitutional reform attempts prior to the APRC by successive governments, spanning from Sri Lanka’s early post-independence years to mid-2006 when the APRC was established. Section II provides an outline of the main events with regard to the APRC from its establishment to the release of its report. Section III seeks to explain the repeated failure of state reform attempts in Sri Lanka and how particular historical factors undermined the APRC’s proceedings. Section IV discusses the key outputs of the APRC and provides a summary of the proposals contained in the APRC’s final report. Section V discusses the continued relevance of the APRC proposals as a sound basis for constitutional reform aimed at resolving the national question. This report has pointed to two interrelated factors that have historically undermined progress towards state reform in Sri Lanka: 1. The influence of majoritarian Sinhala-Buddhist ideology in defining the limits of acceptable reform of the Sri Lankan state; and 2. The practice of ethnic outbidding by southern political parties to mobilise their Sinhala majority constituency against power sharing proposals put forward. The proposals contained in the APRC’s final report warrant further consideration than they have been afforded thus far. The ongoing constitutional reform process has presented an important opportunity to revisit the APRC’s proposals. As the product of extensive discussions across a wide cross-section of political parties, the APRC process has laid much of the groundwork upon which renewed deliberations can take place. One step forward would be for the government to formally publish the APRC’s final report as a precursor to meaningful dialogue with minority political parties. As a sound basis for further negotiation, the APRC’s proposals have a vital role to play in securing a long overdue resolution to Sri Lanka’s national question.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVerité Researchen_US
dc.subjectAPRCen_US
dc.subjectAll Party Representative Committeeen_US
dc.subjectstate reformen_US
dc.subjectpower sharingen_US
dc.subjectdevolutionen_US
dc.subjectlegislative powersen_US
dc.subjectMahinda Rajapaksaen_US
dc.subjectBandaranaike-Chelvanayakam Pacten_US
dc.subjectDudley - Chelvanayakam Pacten_US
dc.subjectIndo - Lanka Accorden_US
dc.subjectLTTEen_US
dc.subjectUNPen_US
dc.subjectSLFPen_US
dc.subjectLessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commissionen_US
dc.subjectLLRCen_US
dc.titleThe APRC: A Primer for Constitutional Consensus = සර්ව පාක්ෂික නියෝජිත කමිටුව: ව්‍යවස්ථාමය සම්මුතියකට ප්‍රවේශයක්en_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record