Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde Mel, Nishan
dc.contributor.authorAbeysinghe, Subhashini
dc.contributor.authorArangala, Mathisha
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-19T15:16:09Z
dc.date.available2020-08-19T15:16:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.veriteresearch.net/handle/123456789/2889
dc.description29p.en_US
dc.description.abstractSri Lanka is highly dependent on international loans from multilateral and bilateral sources to finance infrastructure development. Multilateral and bilateral borrowing is often favoured by governments such as Sri Lanka because such financing tends to have ‘concessional’ elements, relative to the international financial markets. However, this report finds that the practice of ‘tying’ loans to procurement from contractors in the lending country and resulting cost escalations can significantly erode the concessional or grant element of these loans. This paper thus explores the extent to which seemingly concessional loans might have other hidden costs attached to it by developing and deploying a methodology for analysing the trade-off between the grant element and tied element of a selection of foreign loans taken by Sri Lanka from multiple lenders (e.g. China, Japan and India). The findings of this research suggest that Sri Lanka may be overestimating the benefits of bilateral loans that are concessional.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectExternal debten_US
dc.subjectForeign debten_US
dc.subjectPublic financeen_US
dc.subjectExternal financingen_US
dc.subjectCIPE05en_US
dc.subjectExternal Resources Departmenten_US
dc.subjectWorld Banken_US
dc.subjectAsian Development Bank - ADBen_US
dc.titleFinancing Infrastructure: The (Non) Concessionality of Concessional Loansen_US
dc.typeresearchreporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record