Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde Mel, Nishan
dc.contributor.authorJayasinha, Uween
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T17:04:51Z
dc.date.available2020-12-11T17:04:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.veriteresearch.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/3113
dc.description.abstractThe pricing data of media institutions reveals that the media discriminates against the democratic process by charging higher rates for political ads than commercial ads, during election periods. This Insight quantifies the discriminatory pricing and analyses the implications, and highlights the gaps in media regulation that allow for such practices. It notes that there is no specific law/regulation enacted in Sri Lanka which governs the pricing and enforces transparency of political ads during election periods. Consequently, democratic interests are vulnerable to being flouted, instead of being supported, by the media. Furthermore, the insight notes that although the Election Commission of Sri Lanka issues guidelines to promote ethical media practices, the lack of enforcement mechanisms is a common theme of the guidelines, which renders them rather inconsequential. This Insight shows how the lack of regulation in favour of democracy has allowed the Sri Lankan media to introduce a price discrimination system during elections, which exploits the democratic interests of the country, and of the parliamentary candidates.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVerité Researchen_US
dc.subjectPrint and electronic media regulationen_US
dc.subjectElection laws in Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectElection Commission of Sri Lanka - ECSLen_US
dc.subjectRight to franchiseen_US
dc.subject19th amendmenten_US
dc.subjectElection 2020 - generalen_US
dc.titleDoes the Sri Lankan media exploit parliamentary candidates during elections?en_US
dc.typeInsighten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record